Cap tables for dummies
The option pool, and the pool shuffle that costs founders real percentage points
The option pool is simple. The timing of when it is created is not, and it moves real percentage points between founders and investors. Same round, worked both ways.
An option pool is a block of shares set aside for people you have not hired yet. That is all it is.
The mechanics are trivial. The timing is where founders lose points they never see coming.
Why reserve shares at all
You could issue options grant by grant as you hire. Nobody does, for two reasons: each issuance needs board approval, and investors want the dilution from your hiring plan visible now rather than arriving in instalments.
So you reserve a block — say 1,500,000 shares out of a fully diluted 11,600,000, about 13% — and grant out of it as you hire. The reserved-but-ungranted portion sits on the cap table as its own line.
Size it from a plan, not a rule of thumb
“10 to 15%” is the standard answer and a lazy one. Build it from the roles you will actually hire before the next round:
| Role | Grant | Shares |
|---|---|---|
| VP Engineering | 1.2% | 139,200 |
| 2 × Senior engineer | 0.4% each | 92,800 |
| Head of Sales | 0.8% | 92,800 |
| 3 × Early employee | 0.15% each | 52,200 |
| Buffer / refreshers | — | 130,000 |
| Total | 507,000 |
If your plan needs 507,000 shares and someone proposes a 1,500,000-share pool, you now have a specific argument rather than a feeling. A hiring plan is the only thing that wins this negotiation.
Now the expensive part: when the pool is created
Your company: 10,100,000 shares fully diluted, no pool yet. An investor offers $2,000,000 at an $8,000,000 pre-money valuation — a $10,000,000 post-money — and wants a 10% post-round option pool.
Two ways to do that, and they are not equivalent.
Version A — pool created pre-money (the standard ask)
The pool comes out of the pre-money valuation, so the ownership must work out to: investor 20%, pool 10%, everyone else 70%.
existing shares ÷ 70% = 10,100,000 ÷ 0.70 = 14,428,571 total post-round
investor 20% = 2,885,714 shares
new pool 10% = 1,442,857 shares
price per share = $2,000,000 ÷ 2,885,714 = $0.6931
| Holder | Shares | % |
|---|---|---|
| Founder A | 6,000,000 | 41.58% |
| Founder B | 4,000,000 | 27.72% |
| Advisor | 100,000 | 0.69% |
| Option pool (new) | 1,442,857 | 10.00% |
| Investor | 2,885,714 | 20.00% |
| Total | 14,428,571 | 100% |
Version B — pool created post-money
Same money, same headline valuation, pool created after the investment so everyone shares the dilution:
existing ÷ 80% = 10,100,000 ÷ 0.80 = 12,625,000 after investment
investor 20% = 2,525,000 shares
price per share = $2,000,000 ÷ 2,525,000 = $0.7921
then add a 10% pool: 12,625,000 ÷ 0.90 = 14,027,778 total
new pool = 1,402,778 shares
| Holder | Shares | % |
|---|---|---|
| Founder A | 6,000,000 | 42.77% |
| Founder B | 4,000,000 | 28.51% |
| Advisor | 100,000 | 0.71% |
| Option pool (new) | 1,402,778 | 10.00% |
| Investor | 2,525,000 | 18.00% |
| Total | 14,027,778 | 100% |
The difference
| Founders combined | Investor | |
|---|---|---|
| Version A (pre-money pool) | 69.30% | 20.00% |
| Version B (post-money pool) | 71.28% | 18.00% |
| Difference | −1.98 pts | +2.00 pts |
Same $2,000,000. Same “$8M pre.” Two percentage points of the company moved, purely on when the pool is deemed to exist.
And notice the share price: $0.6931 in Version A versus $0.7921 in Version B. The pre-money pool quietly lowers the price the investor pays per share, which is another way of saying the real pre-money valuation was never $8M — it was $8M minus the pool.
What to do about it
Expect the pre-money ask. It is the market standard, and walking in outraged does not help.
Negotiate the size, not the principle. A defensible hiring plan for 8% beats an undefended 15%, and the points you save are worth more than the argument about timing you will probably lose.
Quote yourself the effective pre-money. In Version A, an $8M pre-money with a 10% pre-money pool is economically a $7M pre-money. Compare offers on that basis and surprisingly often the “higher” valuation is the worse deal.
Do not over-reserve. Unallocated pool shares dilute you and benefit nobody. An oversized pool left over at the next round gets counted as existing dilution and the investor asks you to top it up again anyway.
Next
Part 4: vesting. The pool is shares set aside — vesting is how those shares are actually earned, and it is the part employees most often misunderstand about their own grant.
Questions
- What is an option pool?
- A block of shares reserved for future employee equity grants. The shares exist on the cap table as reserved but ungranted, so the dilution is visible immediately rather than arriving grant by grant.
- What is the option pool shuffle?
- The practice of creating or topping up the option pool pre-money, meaning before the investor's money is counted. Because the new pool comes out of the pre-money valuation, existing shareholders absorb all of its dilution and the investor absorbs none.
- How big should my option pool be?
- Size it from a hiring plan, not from a rule of thumb. Typical seed-stage pools run 10-15% fully diluted, but the right number is whatever covers the grants you actually plan to make before your next round, plus a small buffer.
- Can I negotiate the option pool in a term sheet?
- Yes, and it is one of the more negotiable economic terms. The two levers are size (a hiring plan justifying 8% beats an arbitrary 15%) and timing (pre-money versus post-money). Both are worth real percentage points.
FIRST COHORT — Q4 2026
Own your cap table, not a contract.
ESOP.fyi opens its first cohort in Q4 2026. One email when doors open — nothing else.
JOIN THE WAITLIST